SC wraps up Ayodhya title dispute hearing, reserves verdict

Must Read

Jharkhand polls for 81 constituencies from November 30 to December 20; counting on 23rd December

Addressing a press meeting today, Chief Election Commissioner Sunil Arora has announced the poll dates for Jharkhand Legislative assembly....

Congress forms six-member committee of AICC to review situation of NRC in Assam

In a bid to review the condition of Assam state after the implementation of the NRC exercise, Congress party...

Shiv Sena elects Eknath Shinde as party’s legislative leader; Sunil Prabhu appointed as chief whip of party

In a striking breakthrough, Shiv Sena elected senior minister Eknath Shinde as the party's legislative leader today. It has...
New Delhi, Oct 16 (IANS) After 40 days of hearing, the Supreme Court on Wednesday reserved the judgement in the 70-year-old politically vexing Ayodhya title dispute.

A five-judge bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi began the daily hearing into the matter on August 6 after the court-appointed mediation panel, headed by a former apex court judge, failed to amicably resolve the matter.

At 4 p.m. on Wednesday as senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan, appearing for the Muslim side was arguing, the Chief Justice called off the hearing and declared the court has reserved the judgement on the matter.

“Hearing is over, and the judgement is reserved,” said Chief Justice Gogoi, who is expected to deliver the judgement before his retirement on November 17.

The bench also comprises Justice S.A. Bobde, Justice Ashok Bhushan, Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, and Justice S.A. Nazeer.

The last day of hearing, where every of the courtroom was packed, saw extremely heated exchanges between the Hindu and Muslim side. Dhavan, in fact, shocked the court by tearing a pictorial map identifying the birthplace of Lord Ram submitted by a senior counsel representing the All India Hindu Mahasabha. This act did not go down well with the bench, and the Chief Justice expressed his anguish.

In the first half of the day, Hindu parties argued and urged the court to correct the historical wrong where a mosque has been built on a site considered holy by Hindus.

In turn, Dhavan said that the Muslim parties seek restoration of Babri Masjid as it stood on December 5, 1992. “The demolished building belonged to us. The right to reconstruct it also belongs to us. Nobody else has the right,” he submitted.

He even used unfavorable language against a lawyer for the Hindu side, who had argued on the Islamic law, and referred that the Babri Masjid was not an Islamic structure.

“The Sultanate began only in 1206. Islam is an extremely attractive faith for people living in a caste-ridden society,” Dhavan submitted before the bench.

The court now has asked counsel from both sides to submit their written submissions on the moulding of relief in the matter.


Disclaimer This article is published directly through a syndicated feed and not edited by The Indian Wire staff.

- Advertisement -

Latest News

Rahane all set to move to DC; RR look to get Markande, Tewatia

By Baidurjo BhoseNew Delhi, Nov 14 (IANS) India's Test deputy Ajinkya Rahane's move to Delhi...

Ayodhya saint held for remarks on TV debate

Ayodhya, Nov 14 (IANS) Mahant Paramhansdas, who had made some highly derogatory remarks on a TV channel against the Ram Janambhoomi Nyas head, Mahant...

Maharashtra: BJP-Sena split unites a divided Congerss-NCP

By Quaid NajmiMumbai, Nov 14 (IANS) Congress Interim President Sonia Gandhi is said to be a happy woman, smiling and grinning from ear-to-ear over...

36 women register online for Sabarimala pilgrimage

Thiruvananthapuram, Nov 14 (IANS) With a fresh two-month-long Sabarimala season all set to open on Sunday, as many as 36 women have registered through...

‘Saand Ki Aankh’ special screening organised on Children’s Day

Pune, Nov 14 (IANS) A special screening of the recently released Taapsee Pannu and Bhumi Pednekar-starrer "Saand Ki Aankh" has been conducted for students...
- Advertisement -

More Articles Like This