Supreme Court slams Prashant Bhushan, issues notice for tweets on ‘Sub-Judice’ CBI matter

Must Read

Jharkhand polls for 81 constituencies from November 30 to December 20; counting on 23rd December

Addressing a press meeting today, Chief Election Commissioner Sunil Arora has announced the poll dates for Jharkhand Legislative assembly....

Congress forms six-member committee of AICC to review situation of NRC in Assam

In a bid to review the condition of Assam state after the implementation of the NRC exercise, Congress party...

Shiv Sena elects Eknath Shinde as party’s legislative leader; Sunil Prabhu appointed as chief whip of party

In a striking breakthrough, Shiv Sena elected senior minister Eknath Shinde as the party's legislative leader today. It has...
Part-time Traveler| Full-time Political Enthusiast | Foodie | Strong Believer of Freedom of Speech and Expressions!

The Supreme Court issued a notice to Senior Lawyer Prashant Bhushan after Attorney General KK Venugopal representing the Centre accused him of contempt for his tweets on the appointment of Nageshwar Rao as the interim chief of the Central Bureau of Investigation. Prashant Bhushan has sought three weeks’ time to file a reply. The case will be heard again on March 7.

“He should have applied to get the minutes of the meeting instead. The time has come to put guidelines on whether lawyers can write on a matter that’s sub-judice,” said Attorney General KK Venugopal, who has filed a separate petition on the issue apart from the plea challenging the appointment Nageshwar Rao, as the Interim Chief of CBI on January 10 by high powered panel headed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Though KK Venugopal said he was not pressing for punishment and a decision on larger issues, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said, “The Attorney General is magnanimous. But the Centre wants Bhushan punished as this is not the first instance he has done this.”
The Top Court Bench comprising justices Arun Mishra and Naveen Sinha slammed Prashant Bhushan for passing comments on Sub-judice matter. The Bench further said it would deal with the larger question of whether it is open for lawyers or any other person to criticize the court in a sub judice matter which would lead to influencing public opinion.
The Bench said, ‘Issue required to be heard in Length, and notice issue on this regard’
Nageshwar Rao was appointed as CBI interim Director for the Second time on January 10 by the panel that sacked the then CBI Boss Alok Verma.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisement -

Latest News

Mamata lashes out at Dhankhar, calls him ‘BJP mouthpiece’

Kolkata, Nov 14 (IANS) West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on Thursday made a veiled attack on Governor Jagdeep...

Settlement of Naga insurgency vital: Nagaland CM

Kohima, Nov 14 (IANS) Nagaland Chief Minister Neiphiu Rio on Thursday said that the settlement of the vexed Naga insurgency problem between the Naga...

Shami, Umesh & Ishant bowling well as a pack: Ashwin (Lead)

Indore, Nov 14 (IANS) It was a dicey toss to win for Bangladesh skipper Mominul Haque in the first Test against India on Thursday,...

Don’t politicise national security matters, Rajnath to Oppn

New Delhi, Nov 14 (IANS) Defence Minister Rajnath Singh on Thursday said that the Supreme Court verdict on the review petitions over Rafale procurement...

Private investment in higher education needs to grow: JGU VC

Mumbai, Nov 14 (IANS) India will significantly lag behind other nations like China and South Korea if financial investment in higher education is not...
- Advertisement -

More Articles Like This