Ayodhya verdict : Four review petitions filed against Supreme Court’s orders

RSS slams BJP over Statue of Unity; questions government's inability to pass law for construction of Ram temple in Ayodhya

In the famous Ayodhya verdict, All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) filed four review petitions on Friday against the Supreme Court’s decision in Ram-Janmabhoombh-Babri-Masjid land title dispute verdict. The review petitions were filed by Maulana Mufti Hasbullah, Mohd Umar, Maulana Mahfoozur Rehman, and Mishbahuddin.

On November 9, former Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi-led bench unanimously gave the whole of 2.7 acres land to the Ram Lalla and said that the government has to form a trust that will oversee the construction of a Ram temple at the site. It also allotted a separate land piece (twice the size of disputed land) to the Muslim party (Sunni Waqf Board).

Submitting their petitions, petitioners have challenged the title of the land given to Hindu parties. It claimed that the Hindu parties don’t have any exclusive possession on the land. The petitioners argued that the review plea has been filed not to disturb the peace.

Previously on December 2, the first review was filed by Maulana Syed Ashhad Rashidi, the legal heir of the original litigant, M, Siddiq, and the Uttar Pradesh president of Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind. It said that the “complete justice” could only be done by reconstructing the Babri Masjid.

Maulana Syed Ashhad Rashidi had also sought an interim stay on implementing the directives of the Supreme Court. Country’s apex court had directed the Union government to form a trust within three months for the construction of a Ram temple at the site.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here